The finding
The single-wide is the easier home to place here.
In most of the counties in this library the single-wide is the restricted one - barred from districts the double-wide is allowed in, or carrying a minimum width the single-wide cannot meet. Durham reads the other way round. Both classes are permitted in accordance with the use table, and then the ordinance writes a list of standards for Class A and a much shorter list for Class B. Durham's own guidance page makes the mapping plain rather than leaving it to inference: Class A is essentially a double-wide, Class B essentially a single-wide.
- Class A: at least 960 square feet of enclosed and heated living area, a length not exceeding four times its width, a minimum roof rise of three feet for each 12 feet of horizontal run with standard residential shingles, an eave projection of no less than six inches, horizontal siding, and a continuous permanent masonry foundation or masonry curtain wall.
- Class B: manufactured after July 1, 1976, and skirted with a durable material that encloses the area between the chassis and the ground. The ordinance names vinyl or masonry as examples and does not limit the material to them. Durham's guidance states there are no restrictions on siding and roof design for Class B.
- Both classes have to have been manufactured after July 1, 1976, which is the pre-HUD line the whole state draws and not a Durham rule.
- This is not permission to assume a single-wide goes anywhere. The first question is still the district: §5.3.2D permits Class A and Class B in accordance with the use table in §5.1, so a district that does not list the use is a stop regardless of class.
- What it does mean is that the cost of the Durham standards falls mostly on the double-wide buyer, and a masonry curtain wall around a double-wide is not a small line on a quote.
